Digital Library of LBUS

Artificial Aesthetics Rethinking Authorship, Aesthetics, and Affect in AI - Generated Cinema

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ostad, Samaneh
dc.contributor.author Serban, Andrei C.
dc.date.accessioned 2026-04-03T07:59:08Z
dc.date.available 2026-04-03T07:59:08Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.identifier.citation Ostad, Samaneh and Șerban, Andrei C. “Artificial Aesthetics: Rethinking Authorship, Aesthetics, and Affect in AI-Generated Cinema”, Journal of Performing Arts , no. 3 (2025): 78-99. DOI: 10.54989/JAS.24.04 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2066-8988
dc.identifier.issn 2067-144X
dc.identifier.uri http://digital-library.ulbsibiu.ro:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4441
dc.description Ostad, Samaneh and Șerban, Andrei C. “Artificial Aesthetics: Rethinking Authorship, Aesthetics, and Affect in AI-Generated Cinema”, Journal of Performing Arts , no. 3 (2025): 78-99. DOI: 10.54989/JAS.24.04 en_US
dc.description.abstract This article explores how artificial intelligence is changing the work of filmmakers and the way we understand authorship in today’s cinema. It looks closely at three short films made entirely with AI tools: The Frost (Waymark, 2024), Thank You for Not Answering (Paul Trillo, 2023), and Poof (Pizza Later, 2024). Rather than treating creativity as the expression of a single author, these films show it as something that takes shape between human decisions, machine outputs, and the viewer’s interpretation. Using ideas from Barthes, Foucault, Manovich, Zylinska, and Arielli, the article argues that the filmmaker’s role shifts from controlling images to working with what the system generates and making sense of it. Visually, these films reveal a kind of aesthetic that comes from the technology itself; glitches, unstable textures, and partial forms that reflect the way AI “sees” and constructs the image. The emotional impact also works differently: instead of being predetermined by the filmmaker, it emerges through the viewer’s response to the uncertainty and strangeness of the images. Ethically, the films raise questions about responsibility and transparency, reminding us that any creative work involving AI depends on the data, tools, and systems that make it possible. Taken together, these films suggest that AI does not necessarily push human creativity aside. Instead, it expands the space where meaning can be produced, creating a kind of shared authorship in which humans and machines both play a part. The article uses the term “relational authorship” to describe this shift and argues that it offers a useful way to understand how aesthetics, emotion, and ethics come together in AI-generated cinema. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This article is published as part of the “Establishing a Laboratory of Cultural Heritage in Central Romania” project (ELABCHROM - https://grants.ulbsibiu.ro/elabchrom/) funded by European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme. Grant agreement No 101079282. en_US
dc.publisher Journal of Performing Arts en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Special Issue;No. 3
dc.subject AI cinema en_US
dc.subject authorship en_US
dc.subject artificial aesthetics en_US
dc.subject relational ethics en_US
dc.subject nonhuman vision en_US
dc.subject affect en_US
dc.subject posthuman creativity en_US
dc.title Artificial Aesthetics Rethinking Authorship, Aesthetics, and Affect in AI - Generated Cinema en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ELABCHROM
    Grant agreement ID: 101079282 - Achieving excellence in research in Romania The FORTHEM Alliance of seven European Universities invited Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (LBUS - CO) to join in 2021

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account