Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://digital-library.ulbsibiu.ro:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4523
Title: Between academic dependency and epistemic marginalization: a systematic literature review of environmental justice in post-socialist Eastern Europe
Authors: Vatavu, Bogdan
Serbanuta, Claudia
Bunescu, Ioana
Delibas, Hestia
Velicu, Irina
Iordachescu, George
Keywords: Environmental justice
Academic dependency
Vulnerable groups
Eastern Europe
Systematic literature review
Issue Date: 12-May-2026
Publisher: Taylor&Francis
Citation: Bogdan Vătavu, Claudia Șerbănuță, Ioana Bunescu, Hestia Delibas, Irina Velicu & George Iordăchescu (12 May 2026): Between academic dependency and epistemic marginalization: a systematic literature review of environmental justice in postsocialist Eastern Europe, Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2026.2671384
Series/Report no.: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe;
Abstract: This paper explores the academic conceptualization of environmental justice (EJ) in post-socialist Eastern Europe (EE) through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of 106 peer-reviewed articles from the early 1990s to 2024. The study focuses on two main directions. First, we examined knowledge production and found that EJ scholarship in EE only gained significant attention after the EU accession of countries in the region. Additionally, research on EJ issues in EE appears to be academically dependent on Western funding and expertise. Second, we investigated how authors approach EJ in EE by analysing the theoretical perspectives they adopt, the types of conflicts that receive attention, and whether there is a focus on ethnic minorities in the area. We identified a significant gap between the scholarship reviewed and EJ conflicts as reported in the Environmental Justice Atlas (EJ Atlas). This disconnect is notably evident for Roma communities, whose environmental harms are documented in activist literature but mostly overlooked in academia. Additionally, there is a disparity between the urban focus of EJ literature and the underrepresentation of rural cases. The paper underscores the epistemic marginalization of vulnerable communities, such as rural and Roma groups, and their grassroots perspectives on EJ.
URI: http://digital-library.ulbsibiu.ro:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4523
ISSN: 2573-9646
Appears in Collections:Doing Environmental (In)justice: A Theory in Praxis



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.